AMERSA, Author at AMERSA

We hope that you enjoyed our SAj 12 Days of Holiday Cheer! We loved highlighting some of the best to come to SAj and we hope that you got to read some that great research!

Dec 24, 2019 by AMERSA

Enjoy your Christmas Eve if you celebrate!

SAj 12 Days of Holiday Cheer! Day 12: Our Most Cited

Dec 24, 2019 by AMERSA

12 Days of Holiday Cheer – Celebrating Some of Our Best!

Day 12: Our Most Cited

The following are our top 3 most cited articles:

Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) – Cited 192 and counting!
Mindfulness-Based Relapse Prevention for Substance Use Disorders: A Pilot Efficacy Trial – Cited 108 times and counting!
Mindfulness Meditation for Substance Use Disorders: A Systematic Review – Cited 63 times and counting!

SAj 12 Days of Holiday Cheer! Day 11: Most Viewed

Dec 23, 2019 by AMERSA

12 Days of Holiday Cheer – Celebrating Some of Our Best!

We made it through the countdown of most viewed – and what a great countdown it was! We loved getting to revisit these great pieces of addiction research!

Day 11: Most Read/Viewed:

Confronting Inadvertent Stigma and Pejorative Language in Addiction Scholarship: A Recognition and Response

Lauren M. Broyles, PhD, RN; Ingrid A. Binswanger, MD, MPH; Jennifer A. Jenkins, MPH; Deborah S. Finnell, DNS, PMHNP; Babalola Faseru, MD, MPH; Alan Cavaiola, PhD; Marianne Pugatch, MSW; & Adam J. Gordon, MD, MPH

Abstract: Appropriate use of language in the field of addiction is important. Inappropriate use of language can negatively impact the way society perceives substance use and the people who are affected by it. Language frames what the public thinks about substance use and recovery, and it can also affect how individuals think about themselves and their own ability to change. But most importantly, language intentionally and unintentionally propagates stigma: the mark of dishonor, disgrace, and difference that depersonalizes people, depriving them of individual or personal qualities and personal identity. Stigma is harmful, distressing, and marginalizing to the individuals, groups, and populations who bear it. For these reasons, the Editorial Team of Substance Abuse seeks to formally operationalize respect for personhood in our mission, our public relations, and our instructions to authors. We ask authors, reviewers, and readers to carefully and intentionally consider the language used to describe alcohol and other drug use and disorders, the individuals affected by these conditions, and their related behaviors, comorbidities, treatment, and recovery in our publication. Specifically, we make an appeal for the use of language that (1) respects the worth and dignity of all persons (“people-first language”); (2) focuses on the medical nature of substance use disorders and treatment; (3) promotes the recovery process; and (4) avoids perpetuating negative stereotypes and biases through the use of slang and idioms. In this paper, we provide a brief overview of each of the above principles, along with examples, as well as some of the nuances and tensions that inherently arise as we give greater attention to the issue of how we talk and write about substance use and addiction.

SAj 12 Days of Holiday Cheer! Day 10: 2nd Most Viewed

Dec 22, 2019 by AMERSA

12 Days of Holiday Cheer – Celebrating Some of Our Best!

Day 10: 2nd Most Read/Viewed:

Will strict limits on opioid prescription duration prevent addiction? Advocating for evidence-based policymaking

Mallika L. Mundkur, MD, MPH; Adam J. Gordon, MD, MPH; & Stefan G. Kertesz, MD, MSc

“In 2016, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued the first national guideline in the United States regarding opioid prescribing for pain.¹ The guideline included the recommendation that patients treated for acute pain should receive opioids for no longer than 7 days, prompting at least 5 states to implement laws requiring prescribers not to exceed this threshold when providing initial opioid supplies.² The rapid conversion of this guideline into policy appears to reflect an underlying assumption that limiting initial opioid supplies will reduce opioid consumption and thus addiction. However, in the spirit of “evidence-based policymaking,” we write to caution against misreading the evidence. Further, we recommend not resting addiction policy solely upon a platform of prescription opioid control.” Read the rest of the editorial now!

SAj 12 Days of Holiday Cheer! Day 9: 3rd Most Viewed

Dec 21, 2019 by AMERSA

12 Days of Holiday Cheer – Celebrating Some of Our Best!

Day 9: 3rd Most Read/Viewed:

Turning the tide or riptide? The changing opioid epidemic

Stefan G. Kertesz, MD, MSc

Abstract: The US opioid epidemic has changed profoundly in the last 3 years, in ways that require substantial recalibration of the US policy response. This report summarizes the changing nature of overdose deaths in Jefferson County (home to Birmingham, Alabama) using data updated through June 30, 2016. Heroin and fentanyl have come to dominate an escalating epidemic of lethal opioid overdose, whereas opioids commonly obtained by prescription play a minor role, accounting for no more than 15% of reported deaths in 2015. Such local data, along with similar reports from other localities, augment the insights available from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s current overdose summary, which lacks data from 2015–2016 and lacks information regarding fentanyl in particular. The observed changes in the opioid epidemic are particularly remarkable because they have emerged despite sustained reductions in opioid prescribing and sustained reductions in prescription opioid misuse. Among US adults, past-year prescription opioid misuse is at its lowest level since 2002. Among 12th graders it is at its lowest level in 20 years. A credible epidemiologic account of the opioid epidemic is as follows: although opioid prescribing by physicians appears to have unleashed the epidemic prior to 2012, physician prescribing no longer plays a major role in sustaining it. The accelerating pace of the opioid epidemic in 2015–2016 requires a serious reconsideration of governmental policy initiatives that continue to focus on reductions in opioid prescribing. The dominant priority should be the assurance of subsidized access to evidence-based medication-assisted treatment for opioid use disorder. Such treatment is lacking across much of the United States at this time. Further aggressive focus on prescription reduction is likely to obtain diminishing returns while creating significant risks for patients.