AMERSA

AMERSA

Call Us: (401) 615-4047 | Contact Us AMERSA on Twitter AMERSA on LinkedIn AMERSA on BlueSky

Make a Donation Pay a Past-Due Balance Join Our Mailing List
  • About
    • What is AMERSA
    • Board of Directors
    • Donate to AMERSA
    • Contact Us
  • Membership
    • Get to Know AMERSA
    • Join / Renew
    • Who We Are
    • Member Center
    • Special Interest Groups
    • Career Opportunities
    • Professional & Academic Advancement Opps
  • Conference
    • Annual Conference
    • Conference Sponsorship
    • Conference Exhibitor Information
    • Policy and Procedures for AMERSA Events
    • 2024 Conference Materials
    • Past Conference Resources
  • Journal
    • Journal Home
    • About Us
    • Member Access to Journal
    • Author Instructions and Submission
    • SAj Blog
    • SAj Annual Awards
    • SAj Editorial Scholar Program
  • Advocacy
    • AMERSA Advocacy
    • Position Statements
    • Submit a Position Statement
    • Letters of Support
    • Public Comments
  • Sustainability
    • Initiatives
    • Resources
  • Education
    • AMERSA Podcast Series
    • AMERSA Webinars
    • Core Competencies – AMERSA in the 21st Century
    • Resources
  • Awards
    • AMERSA Awards
    • Current Award Winners
    • Past Award Winners

The Authors’ Own Words: Development and evaluation of a standardized research definition for opioid overdose outcomes

Nov 10, 2019 by AMERSA

The Authors’ Own Words:  

We ask authors to describe their impressions regarding the implications of their accepted work, how their findings will change practice, and what is noteworthy about the work. 

Development and evaluation of a standardized research definition for opioid overdose outcomes

Ingrid A. Binswanger, MD, MPH, MS; Komal J. Narwaney, PhD; Edward M. Gardner, MD; Barbara A. Gabella, MSPH; Susan L. Calcaterra, MD, MPH; Jason M. Glanz, PhD

Substance Abuse Vol. 40, Iss. 1, 2019

“There is little consensus on how to verify opioid overdose outcomes for research purposes. To ensure reproducibility, minimize misclassification, and permit data harmonization across studies, standardized and consistent overdose definitions are needed. Thus, Binswanger and colleagues developed and evaluated a case criteria classification scheme for pharmaceutical opioid and heroin overdoses in two distinct health systems, using information commonly available in electronic health records. This scheme was compared with clinician impression and encounter documentation. This novel case criteria classification scheme for opioid overdose represents a potential option for a consistent and reproducible definition of overdose in multi-site research.“

Filed Under: SAj Blog, The Authors' Own Words, Uncategorized Tagged With: development, evaluation, opioid, opioid overdose, outcomes, overdose, research

Copyright © 2025
Site by: web360